Table of contents

DAST, or Dynamic Application Security Testing, is a security testing methodology that analyzes applications during their operating states to identify vulnerabilities and security flaws. Unlike static testing approaches that examine source code, DAST simulates real-world attacks on running applications to detect exploitable weaknesses—without requiring access to the underlying codebase.

DAST tools are commonly used in web, API, and cloud-native environments to detect issues such as injection flaws, misconfigurations, and authentication weaknesses. Because they operate against live applications, DAST tests are language-agnostic and can be applied to a wide range of technologies and platforms.

What is DAST?

DAST is a black-box testing technique, meaning it examines an application from the outside, without visibility into its internal logic or architecture. Instead of analyzing source code, DAST tools interact with an application through HTTP requests, inputs, and user behaviors to probe for vulnerabilities.

This approach mimics the tactics of a real attacker, scanning for weaknesses such as:

DAST is typically used in staging or testing environments but can also be run safely against production systems under controlled conditions.

How DAST works

DAST tools crawl a running application, generate input values, and analyze the application’s behavior in response to simulated attacks. These tools often include:

  • Crawlers to discover available endpoints, forms, and inputs
  • Fuzzers to inject malformed or malicious data and observe outcomes
  • Heuristic engines to identify response patterns indicative of security flaws
  • Reporting modules that categorize and prioritize findings based on risk

Some advanced DAST tools also integrate authentication handling (e.g., session token management or OAuth) and support API-specific testing, such as OpenAPI or GraphQL scanning.

Unlike SAST (Static Application Security Testing), DAST doesn’t flag issues in code itself. Instead, it identifies vulnerabilities in the behavior of the application as it processes inputs and handles requests.

Benefits of DAST

DAST offers several benefits that make it a critical component of a well-rounded application security strategy:

Language-agnostic coverage

Because DAST tests applications through their interfaces, it doesn’t depend on the programming language, framework, or architecture. It can scan applications built in Java, Python, .NET, Node.js, and more—making it ideal for heterogeneous environments.

Real-world risk validation

DAST detects issues in the way an application behaves, providing insight into how vulnerabilities could be exploited by attackers. It identifies runtime security flaws that may not be visible in source code or container images.

Complements other security testing

DAST complements other testing approaches, such as SAST and Software Composition Analysis (SCA), by uncovering vulnerabilities that may result from runtime misconfigurations, logic flaws, or infrastructure exposure.

Continuous integration potential

Some DAST tools can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated scans as part of the software delivery process. This helps shift security left and detect vulnerabilities before code reaches production.

Limitations of DAST

While DAST is a powerful tool, it’s not without limitations:

  • Limited coverage for internal logic: Since DAST doesn’t access source code, it may miss issues like insecure business logic or internal-only vulnerabilities.
  • Slow scan times: DAST scans can take longer than static scans, especially for large or complex applications with many endpoints.
  • False positives or negatives: Because DAST relies on heuristics and response patterns, it may incorrectly flag or overlook certain vulnerabilities.
  • Environmental requirements: DAST requires a deployed, running application environment, which can add complexity to testing workflows—especially for microservices and containerized architectures.

For these reasons, DAST is most effective when used in combination with other testing approaches as part of a broader DevSecOps strategy.

DAST vs. other testing methods

DAST is just one piece of the application security testing puzzle. Here’s how it compares to other approaches:

DAST vs. SAST

  • DAST analyzes running applications, requiring no access to source code.
  • SAST scans code during development or build time to detect vulnerabilities before the application is deployed.
  • While SAST is ideal for early detection, DAST validates security issues that manifest during real application execution.

DAST vs. IAST

  • Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) combines elements of DAST and SAST by analyzing applications from within using instrumentation.
  • IAST provides more accurate insights by observing the code and runtime environment simultaneously but requires deeper integration with the application stack.

DAST vs. SCA

  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA) focuses on identifying known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and dependencies.
  • While DAST can detect issues in the application’s behavior, SCA targets supply chain risks and dependency health.

Each method has its strengths. A mature application security program typically includes all of these approaches for comprehensive coverage.

DAST in cloud-native environments

As organizations adopt microservices, containers, and serverless functions, traditional DAST tools must evolve. Modern DAST tools increasingly support:

  • API security testing: Scanning RESTful, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs, often with OpenAPI or Postman integration
  • Containerized app support: Running DAST scans against ephemeral or container-based test environments
  • Authentication and token handling: Managing complex auth flows (e.g., JWT, OAuth2) that are common in modern apps
  • CI/CD integration: Incorporating DAST scans into build pipelines to catch issues before deployment

For security teams operating in Kubernetes, multi-cloud, or serverless environments, DAST tools must integrate seamlessly with DevOps workflows and scale alongside infrastructure.

How Orca Security helps

The Orca Cloud Security Platform enhances application security before deployment and in runtime across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, and Kubernetes environments.

While Orca does not operate as a traditional DAST tool, it complements DAST by:

  • Detecting, prioritizing, and remediating risks in runtime environments, including misconfigurations, excessive permissions, and unprotected APIs
  • Scanning git repositories and other code artifacts for misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and secrets 
  • Setting guardrails to notify developers of issues or block risky builds from reaching production
  • Performing Agentless and Dynamic Reachability Analysis in production environments to detect and prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities 
  • Integrating with CI/CD pipelines, source code management (SCM) platforms, and ticketing systems to accelerate developer workflows

Orca helps organizations secure their cloud-native applications at every stage of the application lifecycle.

Table of contents

Previous Post DevOps
Next Post Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)